Taiwanese Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Volume 47, Issue 1 , Pages 49-56, March 2008

Reappraisal of Fetal Abdominal Circumference in an Asian Population: Analysis of 50,131 Records

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, National Cheng Kung University Medical College and Hospital, Tainan, Taiwan

Accepted 5 July 2007.

Article Outline

Summary 

Objective

Fetuses from different populations may show different growth patterns. In obstetrics, fetal abdominal circumference (AC) is a very useful index for assessing fetal growth. In this study, we attempted to establish the normal fetal growth curves of AC in an Asian population in South Taiwan.

Materials and Methods

We reviewed our computer ultrasound database of fetal AC records from January 1991 to December 2006. During the study period of 1 6 years, only the fetuses examined by ultrasonography with gestational age between 1 4 and 41 weeks were included. We excluded extreme bilateral records after initial analysis. Eventually, 50,131 records of AC were included for final analysis.

Results

The observed gestation-specific AC values and the predicted AC values were calculated. The best-fit regression equation of AC versus gestational age is a second-order polynomial equation. In general, fetal AC values in our population showed similar patterns to those in Western populations. Besides, we established a table of the predicted AC values based on specific gestational age, including the 5th, 1 0th, 50th, 90th and 95th centiles, for clinical reference.

Conclusion

To the best of our knowledge, our series is the largest sample of AC reported in the medical literature. We believe that the gestational age-specific nomogram of fetal AC is important for further clinical assessment of fetal growth.

Key Words:  abdominal circumference , Asian population , fetus , pregnancy

No full text is available. To read the body of this article, please view the PDF online.

 

Back to Article Outline

References 

  1. Tamura RK , Sabbagha RE . Percentile ranks of sonar fetal abdominal circumference measurements . Am J Obstet Gynecol . 1980;138:475–479
  2. Smith GC , Smith MF , McNay MB , Fleming JE . The relation between fetal abdominal circumference and birth weight: findings in 3,512 pregnancies . Br J Obstet Gynaecol . 1997;104:186–190
  3. Hedriana HL , Moore TR . A comparison of single versus multiple growth ultrasonographic examinations in predicting birth weight . Am J Obstet Gynecol . 1994;170:1600–1604
  4. Chitty LS , Altman DG , Henderson A , Campbell S . Charts of fetal size: 3. abdominal measurements . Br J Obstet Gynaecol . 1994;101:125–131
  5. Snijders RJ , Nicolaides KH . Fetal biometry at 14–40 weeks' gestation . Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol . 1994;4:34–48
  6. Kurmanavicius J, Wright EM, Royston P, Zimmermann R, Huch R, Huch A, et al. Fetal ultrasound biometry: 2. Abdomen and femur length reference values . Br J Obstet Gynaecol . 1999;106:136–143
  7. Smulian JC , Ananth CV , Vintzileos AM , Guzman ER . Revisiting sonographic abdominal circumference measurements: a comparison of outer centiles with established nomograms . Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol . 2001;18:237–243
  8. Paladini D, Rustico M, Viora E, Giani U, Bruzzese D, Campogrande M, et al. Fetal size charts for the Italian population: normative curves of head, abdomen and long bones . Prenat Diagn . 2005;25:456–464
  9. Salomon LJ, Duyme M, Crequat J, Brodaty G, Talmant C, Fries N, et al. French fetal biometry: reference equations and comparison with other charts . Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol . 2006;28:193–198
  10. Jung SI , Lee YH , Moon MH , et al.   Reference charts and equations of Korean fetal biometry . Prenat Diagn . 2007;27:545–551
  11. Drooger JC , Troe JW , Borsboom GJ , et al.   Ethnic differences in prenatal growth and the association with maternal and fetal characteristics . Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol . 2005;26:115–122

PII: S1028-4559(08)60054-6

doi:10.1016/S1028-4559(08)60054-6

Taiwanese Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Volume 47, Issue 1 , Pages 49-56, March 2008

Article Tools