Volume 47, Issue 3 , Pages 312-317, September 2008
Laparoscopic Pelvic Floor Repair Using Polypropylene Mesh
Article Outline
Summary
Objective
The purpose of this report is to present our experience in laparoscopic pelvic floor repair using polypropylene mesh for the treatment of advanced vaginal vault prolapse and enterocele.
Materials and Methods
A total of 40 patients with Baden-Walker System grade 3 or 4 vaginal vault prolapse and concurrent enterocele were recruited. Twenty patients had undergone at least one previous pelvic floor reconstructive procedure and were categorized as the recurrent prolapse group. The other 20 patients were categorized as the nonrecurrent group. All patients underwent a laparoscopic pelvic floor repair using a single piece of polypropylene mesh combined with uterosacral ligament suspension.
Results
The mean age of the study group was 60.7 years. The mean follow-up period was 26.6 months. The intraoperative major complication rate was 5% (two bladder perforations). No recurrent apical prolapse, anterior vaginal wall or posterior vaginal wall prolapse was observed at postoperative follow-up. The overall mesh erosion rate was 12.5% (5 of 40 patients), with four erosions (20%) in the recurrent prolapse group and one erosion (5%) in the nonrecurrent group. Mesh-related pain syndromes and dyspareunia was reported in 21.4% of patients in the recurrent prolapse group and 6.3% of patients in the nonrecurrent group.
Conclusion
Laparoscopic pelvic floor repair using a single piece of polypropylene mesh combined with uterosacral ligament suspension appears to be a feasible procedure for the treatment of advanced vaginal vault prolapse and enterocele. Fewer mesh erosions and postoperative pain syndromes were seen in patients who had no previous pelvic floor reconstructive surgery.
Key Words: laparoscopy , pelvic floor , polypropylene , surgical mesh , vaginal prolapse
No full text is available. To read the body of this article, please view the PDF online.
References
- . Epidemiologic evaluation of reoperation for surgically treated pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence . Am J Obstet Gynecol . 2003;189:1261–1267
- . Scientific basis for use of grafts during vaginal reconstructive procedures . Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol . 2005;17:519–529
- . ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 79. Pelvic organ prolapse . Obstet Gynecol . 2007;109:461–473
- . Mesh augmentation during pelvic-floor reconstructive surgery: risks and benefits . Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol . 2006;18:560–566
- In: Liu CY editors. Laparoscopic Hysterectomy and Pelvic Floor Reconstruction . Massachusetts: Blackwell Science; 1996;
- . Anatomic aspects of vaginal eversion after hysterectomy . Am J Obstet Gynecol . 1992;166:1717–1724
- . The anatomic defects in rectocele and enterocele . J Pelvic Surg . 1995;1:214–221
- . Laparoscopic sacral colpopexy for vaginal vault prolapse . Obstet Gynecol . 1994;84:885–888
- . Promontofixation for the treatment of prolapse . Urol Clin North Am . 2001;28:151–157
- . Laparoscopic vaginal vault suspension using uterosacral ligaments: a review of 133 cases . J Minim Invasive Gynecol . 2005;12:216–220
- . Bilateral uterosacral ligament vaginal vault suspension with site-specific endopelvic fascia defect repair for treatment of pelvic organ prolapse . Am J Obstet Gynecol . 2000;183:1402–1410
- Abdominal sacrocolpopexy: a comprehensive review . Obstet Gynecol . 2004;104:805–823
- . Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for severe vaginal vault prolapse: five-year outcome . J Minim Invasive Gynecol . 2005;12:221–226
- . Long term review of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy . BJOG . 2005;112:1134–1138
- . Functional and anatomical outcome of anterior and posterior vaginal prolapse repair with prolene mesh . BJOG . 2005;112:107–111
- Vaginal mesh erosion after transvaginal repair of cystocele using Gynemesh or Gynemesh-Soft in 138 women: a comparative study . Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct . 2007;18:73–79
PII: S1028-4559(08)60130-8
doi:10.1016/S1028-4559(08)60130-8
© 2008 Taiwan Association of Obstetric & Gynecology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Volume 47, Issue 3 , Pages 312-317, September 2008
