Volume 44, Issue 4 , Pages 332-337, December 2005
Twin Pregnancies Conceived by Assisted Reproductive Technology: Maternal and Perinatal Outcomes
Article Outline
Summary
Objective
To determine whether twin pregnancies conceived by assisted reproductive technology (ART) are at increased risk of obstetric complications or perinatal morbidity.
Methods
This was a retrospective hospital-based cohort study of all twin pregnancies delivered at 23 or more weeks of gestation between January 1, 2002 and December 31, 2003. The obstetric and neonatal outcomes of twins conceived by ART were compared with the outcomes of those conceived by ovulation induction or spontaneously.
Results
There were 74 twin pregnancies following ART, 31 following ovulation induction and 54 following spontaneous conception. Mean maternal age was significantly higher in the ART group than in the spontaneous group. Mean gestational age and the percentage of pregnancy complications were comparable among groups. There was no significant difference in mean birth weight. The incidences of congenital anomaly, neonatal hypoglycemia, ventilator use, and perinatal death and duration of neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission were significantly higher in the spontaneous group. The percentage of dichorionic pregnancies in the ART group was significantly higher than that in the spontaneous group. The perinatal outcome in dichorionic ART and spontaneous twins was comparable. The incidence of pregnancy complications, NICU admission and perinatal death were comparable in reduced and non-reduced twin pregnancies.
Conclusions
ART-conceived twin pregnancies are not at greater risk for pregnancy complications and adverse perinatal outcome than non-ART-conceived twin pregnancies. Chorionicity is probably an important factor for adverse perinatal outcome. Reduced and non-reduced twin pregnancies are comparable in obstetric and neonatal outcomes.
Key Words: assisted reproductive technology , perinatal outcomes , twin pregnancy
No full text is available. To read the body of this article, please view the PDF online.
References
- . Increasing trends in plural births in the United States . Obstet Gynecol . 1995;85:229–232
- . Maternal morbidity and mortality associated with multiple gestations . Obstet Gynecol . 2000;95:899–904
- . Analysis of 104 twin pregnancies conceived with assisted reproductive technologies and 193 spontaneously conceived twin pregnancies . Fertil Steril . 2000;74:683–689
- . Neonatal outcome of spontaneous and assisted twin pregnancies . Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol . 2001;95:68–72
- . Iatrogenic multiple pregnancy. Higher risk than a spontaneous one? . J Reprod Med . 1997;42:695–698
- . Perinatal outcome of twin pregnancies obtained after in vitro fertilization: comparison with twin pregnancies obtained spontaneously or after ovarian stimulation . Fertil Steril . 1996;66:105–109
- . Outcome of twin pregnancies after assisted reproductive techniques-a comparative study . Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol . 2003;109:51–54
- . Twin pregnancies conceived by assisted reproductive techniques: maternal and neonatal outcomes . Obstet Gynecol . 1997;89:368–372
- . Obstetric and neonatal risk of pregnancies after assisted reproductive technology: a matched control study . Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand . 2003;82:850–856
- . Pregnancy complications, obstetric risks, and neonatal outcome in singleton and twin pregnancies after GIFT and IVF . Arch Gynecol Obstet . 2003;268:256–261
- Lower risks of adverse outcome in twins conceived by artificial reproductive techniques compared with spontaneously conceived twins . Hum Reprod . 1998;13:2005–2008
- . Deliveries and children born after in vitro fertilization in Sweden, 1982–95: a retrospective cohort study . Lancet . 1999;354:1579–1585
- . Multifetal pregnancy reduction of triplet and higher-order multiple pregnancies to twins . Fertil Steril . 2004;81:1420–1422
- . Fetal reduction from twins to a singleton: a reasonable consideration? . Obstet Gynecol . 2004;104:102–109
PII: S1028-4559(09)60166-2
doi:10.1016/S1028-4559(09)60166-2
© 2005 Taiwan Association of Obstetric & Gynecology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Volume 44, Issue 4 , Pages 332-337, December 2005
